Overblog
Suivre ce blog Administration + Créer mon blog
6 mars 2009 5 06 /03 /mars /2009 18:13
Sex, drugs and Islam
By Spengler

Political Islam returned to the world stage with Ruhollah Khomeini's 1979 revolution in Iran, which became the most aggressive patron of Muslim radicals outside its borders, including Hamas in the Palestinian territories and Hezbollah in Lebanon.

Until very recently, an oil-price windfall gave the Iranian state ample resources to pursue its agenda at home and abroad. How, then, should we explain an eruption of social pathologies in Iran such as drug addiction and prostitution, on a scale much worse than anything observed in the West? Contrary to conventional wisdom, it appears that Islamic theocracy promotes rather than represses social decay.

Iran is dying. The collapse of Iran's birth rate during the past 20 years is the fastest recorded in any country, ever. Demographers have sought in vain to explain Iran's population implosion through family planning policies, or through social factors such as the rise of female literacy.

But quantifiable factors do not explain the sudden collapse of fertility. It seems that a spiritual decay has overcome Iran, despite best efforts of a totalitarian theocracy. Popular morale has deteriorated much faster than in the "decadent" West against which the Khomeini revolution was directed.

"Iran is dying for a fight," I wrote in 2007 (Please see Why Iran is dying for a fight, November 13, 2007.) in the literal sense that its decline is so visible that some of its leaders think that they have nothing to lose.

Their efforts to isolate Iran from the cultural degradation of the American "great Satan" have produced social pathologies worse than those in any Western country. With oil at barely one-fifth of its 2008 peak price, they will run out of money some time in late 2009 or early 2010. Game theory would predict that Iran's leaders will gamble on a strategic long shot. That is not a comforting thought for Iran's neighbors.

Two indicators of Iranian morale are worth citing.

First, prostitution has become a career of choice among educated Iranian women. On February 3, the Austrian daily Der Standard published the results of two investigations conducted by the Tehran police, suppressed by the Iranian media. [1]

"More than 90% of Tehran's prostitutes have passed the university entrance exam, according to the results of one study, and more than 30% of them are registered at a university or studying," reports Der Standard. "The study was assigned to the Tehran Police Department and the Ministry of Health, and when the results were tabulated in early January no local newspaper dared to so much as mention them."

The Austrian newspaper added, "Eighty percent of the Tehran sex workers maintained that they pursue this career voluntarily and temporarily. The educated ones are waiting for better jobs. Those with university qualifications intend to study later, and the ones who already are registered at university mention the high tuition [fees] as their motive for prostitution ... they are content with their occupation and do not consider it a sin according to Islamic law."

There is an extensive trade in poor Iranian women who are trafficked to the Gulf states in huge numbers, as well as to Europe and Japan. "A nation is never really beaten until it sells its women," I wrote in a 2006 study of Iranian prostitution, Jihads and whores.

Prostitution as a response to poverty and abuse is one thing, but the results of this new study reflect something quite different. The educated women of Tehran choose prostitution in pursuit of upward mobility, as a way of sharing in the oil-based potlatch that made Tehran the world's hottest real estate market during 2006 and 2007.

A country is beaten when it sells its women, but it is damned when its women sell themselves. The popular image of the Iranian sex trade portrays tearful teenagers abused and cast out by impoverished parents. Such victims doubtless abound, but the majority of Tehran's prostitutes are educated women seeking affluence.

Only in the former Soviet Union after the collapse of communism in 1990 did educated women choose prostitution on a comparable scale, but under very different circumstances. Russians went hungry during the early 1990s as the Soviet economy dissolved and the currency collapsed. Today's Iranians suffer from shortages, but the data suggest that Tehran's prostitutes are not so much pushed into the trade by poverty as pulled into it by wealth.

A year ago I observed that prices for Tehran luxury apartments exceeded those in Paris, as Iran's kleptocracy distributed the oil windfall to tens of thousands of hangers-on of the revolution. $35 billion went missing from state oil funds, opposition newspapers charged at the time. Corruption evidently has made whores of Tehran's educated women. (Please see Worst of times for Iran, June 24, 2008.)

Second, according to a recent report from the US Council on Foreign Relations, "Iran serves as the major transport hub for opiates produced by [Afghanistan], and the UN Office of Drugs and Crime estimates that Iran has as many as 1.7 million opiate addicts." That is, 5% of Iran's adult, non-elderly population of 35 million is addicted to opiates. That is an astonishing number, unseen since the peak of Chinese addiction during the 19th century. The closest American equivalent (from the 2003 National Survey on Drug Use and Health) found that 119,000 Americans reported using heroin within the prior month, or less than one-tenth of 1% of the non-elderly adult population.

Nineteenth-century China had comparable rates of opium addiction, after the British won two wars for the right to push the drug down China's throat. Post-communist Russia had comparable rates of prostitution, when people actually went hungry. Iran's startling rates of opium addiction and prostitution reflect popular demoralization, the implosion of an ancient culture in its encounter with the modern world. These pathologies arose not from poverty but wealth, or rather a sudden concentration of wealth in the hands of the political class. No other country in modern history has evinced this kind of demoralization.

For the majority of young Iranians, there is no way up, only a way out; 36% of Iran's youth aged 15 to 29 years want to emigrate, according to yet another unpublicized Iranian study, this time by the country's Education Ministry, Der Standard adds. Only 32% find the existing social norms acceptable, while 63% complain about unemployment, the social order or lack of money.

As I reported in the cited essay, the potlatch for the political class is balanced by widespread shortages for ordinary Iranians. This winter, widespread natural gas shortages left tens of thousands of households without heat.

The declining morale of the Iranian population helps make sense of its galloping demographic decline. Academic demographers have tried to explain collapsing fertility as a function of rising female literacy. The problem is that the Iranian regime lies about literacy data, and has admitted as much recently.

In a recent paper entitled "Education and the World's Most Raid Fertility Decline in Iran [2], American and Iranian demographers observe:
A first analysis of the Iran 2006 census results shows a sensationally low fertility level of 1.9 for the whole country and only 1.5 for the Tehran area (which has about 8 million people) ... A decline in the TFR [total fertility rate] of more than 5.0 in roughly two decades is a world record in fertility decline. This is even more surprising to many observers when one considers that it happened in one of the most Islamic societies. It forces the analyst to reconsider many of the usual stereotypes about religious fertility differentials.
The census points to a continued fall in fertility, even from today's extremely low levels, the paper maintains.

Most remarkable is the collapse of rural fertility in tandem with urban fertility, the paper adds:
The similarity of the transition in both urban and rural areas is one the main features of the fertility transition in Iran. There was a considerable gap between the fertility in rural and urban areas, but the TFR in both rural and urban areas continued to decline by the mid-1990s, and the gap has narrowed substantially. In 1980, the TFR in rural areas was 8.4 while that of urban areas was 5.6. In other words, there was a gap of 2.8 children between rural and urban areas. In 2006, the TFR in rural and urban areas was 2.1 and 1.8, respectively (a difference of only 0.3 children).
What the professors hoped to demonstrate is that as rural literacy levels in Iran caught up with urban literacy levels, the corresponding urban and rural fertility rates also converged. That is a perfectly reasonable conjecture whose only flaw is that the data on which it is founded were faked by the Iranian regime.

The Iranian government's official data claim literacy percentage levels in the high 90s for urban women and in the high 80s for rural women. That cannot be true, for Iran's Literacy Movement Organization admitted last year (according to an Agence-France Presse report of May 8, 2008) that 9,450,000 Iranians are illiterate of a population of 71 million (or an adult population of about 52 million). This suggests far higher rates of illiteracy than in the official data.

A better explanation of Iran's population implosion is that the country has undergone an existential crisis comparable to encounters of Amazon or Inuit tribes with modernity. Traditional society demands submission to the collective. Once the external constraints are removed, its members can shift from the most extreme forms of modesty to the other extreme of sexual license. Khomeini's revolution attempted to retard the disintegration of Persian society, but it appears to have accelerated the process.

Modernity implies choice, and the efforts of the Iranian mullahs to prolong the strictures of traditional society appear to have backfired. The cause of Iran's collapsing fertility is not literacy as such, but extreme pessimism about the future and an endemic materialism that leads educated Iranian women to turn their own sexuality into a salable commodity.

Theocracy subjects religion to a political test; it is hard for Iranians to repudiate the regime and remain pious, for religious piety and support for political Islam are inseparable, as a recent academic study documented from survey data [3].

As in the decline of communism, what follows on the breakdown of a state ideology is likely to be nihilism. Iran is a dying country, and it is very difficult to have a rational dialogue with a nation all of whose available choices terminate in oblivion.

[1] Der Standard, Die Wahrheit hinter der islamischen Fassade
.

[2] Education and the World's Most Raid Fertility Decline in Iran
.

[3] Religiosity and Islamic Rule in Iran, by Gunes Murat Tezcur and Tagh Azadarmaki.

(Copyright 2009 Asia Times Online (Holdings) Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact us about sales, syndication and republishing.)
Partager cet article
Repost0
5 mars 2009 4 05 /03 /mars /2009 18:48

Cyberpouvoirs

Des données sur l’hélicoptère d’Obama sont retrouvées… en Iran
http://www.silicon.fr/fr/news/2009/03/03/des_donnees_sur_l_helicoptere_d_obama_sont_retrouvees__en_iran

03-03-2009

Par Olivier Robillart



Après un mp3 contenant les positions des troupes américaines en Afghanistan ce sont des informations Top-secret qui ont été retracées en Iran. La Maison blanche aurait-elle des problèmes de plomberie ?


Etrange article que celui de Computerworld. Le site révèle que des informations classées par les autorités américaines se sont retrouvées sur les réseaux p2p. Des données retrouvées sur un ordinateur iranien, la Marine américaine accuse le coup puisque la faille daterait de l’été dernier.

C’est à Téhéran,  la capitale de l’Iran que des informations a priori frappées du sceau Secret Defense se sont retrouvées sur un réseau peer-to-peer accessible à tous. Un réseau destiné en principe à l’échange de musique, vidéos et autres contenus mais qui contient des informations bien particulières.

Selon certains, la fuite proviendrait d’une société américaine basée dans le Maryland ayant passé contrat avec l’armée.

Grâce à une IP iranienne, des experts ont pu retracer l’information et comprendre (mais un peu tard) que d’autres informations sensibles de ce type étaient également présentes comme des documents sur le système de flottaison de Marine One  (l’hélicoptère présidentiel officiel du président américain). Des données encore disponibles la semaine dernière explique la société Tiversa qui a fait la découverte.

Un fait qui rappelle sans équivoque le cas de Chris Ogle, un néo-zélandais de 29 ans qui avait eu la belle surprise en consultant son baladeur MP3 fraîchement acheté sur eBay de découvrir pas moins de 60 pages d'informations militaires sensibles en provenance des Etats-Unis.

Au menu de ce James Bond de circonstance : des données ainsi que les coordonnées de militaires, des informations sur des briefings et même la localisation de certains matériels pour les troupes en place hors des Etats-Unis. Une mine d’informations sur les "Boys" américains déployés en Afghanistan et en Irak datant de 2005.

Des fuites qui ne sont pas que l’apanage des organismes gouvernementaux, outre les entreprises britanniques et allemandes, ce sont parfois les professionnels qui perdent des informations hautement sensibles. C’est ce que rapporte le site Wired en relayant les travaux de ce professeur du Center for Digital Strategies du Dartmouth College (New Hampshire). Le chercheur reporte qu’il a découvert pas moins d'une centaine de dossiers médicaux provenant d’hôpitaux, cliniques ou autres sur des réseaux p2p.

Eric Johnson le directeur de l’Université explique que des numéros de sécurité sociale, des dates de naissance, diagnostic d’assurance et autres étaient librement disponibles si on sait comment chercher. De même, des évaluations psychiatriques, tests HIV, cancers d’environ 20.000 patients étaient également visibles.

Une découverte qui fait froid dans le dos si de telles données étaient utilisées à des fins criminelles ou commerciales. Elle souligne en tout cas le manque de clairvoyance de certaines institutions officielles quant à la préservation de leurs données.

Partager cet article
Repost0
5 mars 2009 4 05 /03 /mars /2009 16:12


Presidential Study Group Reports
Preventing a Cascade of Instability: U.S. Engagement to Check Iranian Nuclear Progress

Format: Softcover, 16 Pages
Published: March 2009

Price: Free Download
File Size: 448 KB





PRESIDENTIAL TASK FORCES

With the Middle East as a focal point of U.S. foreign policymaking, a complex array of regional issues now compete for the urgent attention of America's leaders. In preparation for the first presidential succession of the twenty-first century, The Washington Institute has assembled three independent Presidential Task Forces. Each is composed of its own bipartisan, blue-ribbon group of experts and practitioners, and each is charged with addressing a discrete issue high on the U.S. Middle East policy agenda.

About This Report

On March 4, 2009, The Washington Institute held a special policy forum to mark the publication of this report. Watch the event or download complete audio of the discussion.

Preventing a Cascade of Instability: U.S. Engagement to Check Iranian Nuclear Progress is the final report of The Washington Institute's Presidential Task Force on Iranian Proliferation, Regional Security, and U.S. Policy, a bipartisan, blue-ribbon commission of diplomats, legislators, strategists, scholars, and experts. The task force recommends that the Obama administration act urgently to prevent Iran's nuclear progress from triggering a cascade of instability throughout the Middle East, as such a development could threaten U.S. interests in both regional security and global nonproliferation efforts. Endorsers of the report include key Obama administration officials such as Undersecretary of State for Nonproliferation Robert Einhorn and Dennis Ross, the administration's point man on Iran and the Gulf.

The task force warns that, without strong U.S. leadership, countries in the Middle East may accommodate Iran, attack it, or try to match its new capabilities. The way forward, the report argues, is for Washington to engage Tehran while at the same time increasing diplomatic leverage on the Iranian leadership, including incentives. This would involve closer consultation and coordination with allies, as well as reinforced security measures and tougher international sanctions.

According to the report, now is the time for the United States to promote a policy of "resist and deter" rather than "acquiesce and deter" within the international community. Assertive action now to build U.S. leverage is more likely to prevent Iran's emergence as a military nuclear power. But time is short if diplomatic engagement is to have a chance of success and military confrontation avoided. Iran continues to produce enriched uranium, of which it already has a sufficient amount -- if processed further -- for a bomb.

The Middle East is looking for strong U.S. leadership and reenergized relationships. Vigorous steps to bolster regional defense cooperation could enhance stability and serve to check regional perceptions that U.S. influence is weakening. As part of the solution to the impasse, Washington could propose measures that would also serve to shore up the global nonproliferation system.

Preventing a Cascade of Instability is endorsed by a distinguished group of policy practitioners: member of Congress Gary Ackerman (D-NY); U.S. senator Evan Bayh (D-IN); former CSIS International Security Program senior advisor Robert Einhorn; Washington Institute Military and Security Studies Program director Michael Eisenstadt; former U.S. Strategic Command commander in chief Gen. (Ret.) Eugene Habiger; Washington Institute Gulf and Energy Policy Program director Simon Henderson; Duke University professor of public policy Bruce Jentleson; National Institute for Public Policy senior scholar Robert Joseph; American Enterprise Institute vice president for foreign and defense policy studies Danielle Pletka; former assistant secretary of state Stephen Rademaker; former special Middle East envoy and Washington Institute Ziegler distinguished fellow Dennis Ross; Defense Science Board chairman William Schneider, Jr.; former National Security Council senior director for Middle East affairs Michael Singh; U.S. ambassador to the United Nations Nancy Soderberg; and James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies deputy director Leonard Spector.

Washington Institute executive director Robert Satloff and deputy director Patrick Clawson convened the task force.

Partager cet article
Repost0
3 mars 2009 2 03 /03 /mars /2009 08:53
Gilad: Iran-Hamas ties stronger than ever

Senior Defense Ministry official says Islamist group looking to remove Abbas from power, promote terror activity in West Bank. Adds: 'Hizbullistan' being established in Lebanon

'Hamas sincere.' Gilad Photo: Yotam Frum
 Close window  Close window


Roee Nahmias

Published:  03.02.09, 21:53 / Israel News

"One ofIsrael's biggest mistakes was to allow Hamas to take control over the Gaza Strip in 2007," senior Defense Ministry official Maj. Gen. (res.) Amos Gilad said Monday.

Hamas leader Khaled Mashaal Photo: AFP
 Close window  Close window
Islamist Group
Hamas: We will never recognize Israel / Reuters
Group shuns Abbas' offer of unity gov't, which he says must agree to two-state solution with Israel
Full Story

 

Gilad, who heads the Defense Ministry's Diplomatic-Security Bureau, told a Tel Aviv University conference on Lebanon that the lslamist group is looking to expand its sphere of influence to the West Bank and promote terror activity there as well.

 

"Hamas' strategic objective is to seize control of the Palestinian Authority (PA) and the Palestinian Liberation Organization," he said. "This remains Hamas' vision – to take control over the PA by way of elections, remove (Palestinian President Mahmoud) Abbas and make the West Bank its base.

 

"Hamas is sincere enough to say that this is its plan, and the group refuses to make any statements, even vague ones, regarding the possibility of peace. At most they are willing to mention a possible ceasefire," according to Gilad. "Therefore, the cooperation between Hamas, Hizbullah and Iran is stronger than ever."

 

The defense official stressed that the IDF's recent offensive in Gaza delayed Hamas' plans until January 2010 "at the earliest".

 

As for Hizbullah, Gilad told the conference that the Shiite group was "turning Lebanon into a major threat for Israel because it has Iran's support."

 

"Iran is determined to pose an existential threat for Israel. You don’t have to be a genius to come to this conclusion. (Iranian President Mahmoud) Ahmadinejad has said so himself," he said.

 

"The goal is to create a balance of terror. Towards this end, what can be referred to as 'Hizbullistan' is being established in Lebanon. This entity is based on a military wing – which is meant to assist Iran should Israel attack – and a rocket arsenal, which consists of some 40,000 projectiles."

 

According to Gilad, Hizbullah's short-term goal is to increase its influence in the Lebanese parliament. "Strategically, Hizbullah wants a new Middle East, with Israel as the target," he stated.

 

"We must not allow Iran to obtain nuclear weaponry, because this will bolster the 'radical axis'. Regarding Lebanon, I believe Hizbullah is reframing from firing rockets at Israel not because they are deterred, but because Iran is counting on them in case Israel strikes."

Partager cet article
Repost0
17 février 2009 2 17 /02 /février /2009 15:20
D'après une série d'entretiens auprès de responsables du renseignement US, le Daily Telegraph explique comment Israël, parfois assisté par les Américains, sabote le programme nucléaire iranien, à travers des éliminations, enlèvements, agents doubles. Le but est de prolonger les délais avant l'obtention des moyens techniques effectifs par l'Iran, tout en préparant les fenêtres d'opportunité pour une autre phase d'action, plus déterminante d'action contre la nature de ce programme. En attendant, certains officiels doutent de l'efficacité réelle de ces modus operandi, qui peuvent n'affecter que provisoirement un tel funeste projet...
Israël participerait à des opérations secrètes en Iran

Par Reuters, publié le 17/02/2009 à 18:11

LONDRES - Israël est engagé en Iran dans des opérations de sabotage visant à ralentir les activités par lesquelles Téhéran espère se doter d'une arme nucléaire, rapporte mardi le Daily Telegraph.

Selon le quotidien britannique, qui cite des spécialistes du renseignement et un ancien agent de la CIA non identifié, cette stratégie de "décapitation" prend pour cibles des responsables du programme atomique iranien dans l'espoir de tenir en échec les ambitions du pays en ce domaine sans recourir à la guerre.

L'an dernier, un représentant des milieux du renseignement moyen-orientaux avait déclaré à Reuters qu'Israël comptait frapper des spécialistes du nucléaire iranien au moyen de colis piégés ou empoisonnés, et avait provoqué des explosions en Iran. Ces propos n'avaient cependant pas été confirmés.

Certains analystes notent que les informations faisant état d'opérations de cette nature peuvent s'inscrire dans une guerre psychologique ayant pour but de déstabiliser l'Iran.

Israël, qui passe pour la seule puissance nucléaire du Moyen-Orient, se refuse à tout commentaire à ce sujet.

"Israël a lancé une guerre secrète contre l'Iran comme solution de rechange à des attaques militaires directes contre le programme nucléaire de Téhéran", écrit le Daily Telegraph.

"Il recourt à des tueurs à gages, au sabotage, à des sociétés-écrans et à des agents doubles pour perturber le programme d'armements illégaux du régime, disent les experts."

Meir Javendafar, expert iranien du groupe d'études Meepas, a déclaré à Reuters que des informations faisaient aussi état de la vente de matériels défectueux au secteur nucléaire iranien et de perturbations de l'alimentation en électricité de Natanz, centre d'enrichissement d'uranium situé en plein coeur du pays.

"Je crois qu'une entreprise de sabotage est en cours. C'est une initiative logique, qui a du sens dans (...) la lutte internationale contre les ambitions nucléaires de l'Iran", a-t-il dit.

MORT SUSPECTE

A titre d'exemple de la stratégie prêtée à Israël, des observateurs citent des événements comme la mort d'Ardeshire Hassanpour, ingénieur nucléaire d'Ispahan mort chez lui en 2007, apparemment victime d'un gaz toxique.

Selon l'ex-agent de la CIA cité par le Telegraph, "les perturbations sont conçues pour ralentir le développement du programme de façon à ce qu'ils n'aient pas conscience de ce qui se passe. L'objectif est de retarder encore et encore, jusqu'à ce qu'on dispose d'une solution ou d'une approche différente".

"C'est une bonne politique si l'on veut éviter de s'attaquer à eux par la voie militaire, qui comporte sans doute des risques inacceptables", a-t-il ajouté.

Interrogé sur l'article du journal, Mark Regev, porte-parole du Premier ministre israélien Ehud Olmert, a répondu: "Nous ne commentons pas publiquement ce type d'allégations, ni dans la situation présente, ni dans aucune autre."

Le nouveau président américain Barack Obama a adopté une position plus diplomatique envers l'Iran, rejetant dans l'ombre les menaces d'intervention militaire de l'administration Bush.

Israël prend soin de n'exclure aucune possibilité d'action militaire, mais les analystes se demandent jusqu'où un nouveau gouvernement israélien serait prêt à agir sans le soutien de Washington.

Selon Javendafar, divers signes font penser que plusieurs Etats cherchent à s'infiltrer en Iran pour saper les activités nucléaires du pays. Il laisse toutefois aussi entendre qu'une partie des opérations clandestines évoquées relève de la guerre psychologique plus que d'une réelle entreprise de sabotage.

"Beaucoup de services de renseignement font leur maximum dans ce but. Outre Israël, il y a les Américains et de nombreux services d'espionnage européens, dit-il. Si c'est vrai, cela exerce une pression technique sur le programme iranien. Et même si ce n'est pas vrai, cela fait partie d'une guerre psychologique massive contre le programme nucléaire de l'Iran."

Version française Philippe Bas-Rabérin

 


Report: Israel secretly sabotaging Iran's nuclear program

British Daily Telegraph quotes US intelligence officials as saying Israel using assassins, sabotage, double agents and front companies to interrupt and delay Islamic Republic's nuclear drive

Iranian nuclear reactor in Bushehr  Photo: AP
 Close window  Close window


Ynet

Published:  02.17.09, 08:31 / Israel News
 

Israel is using assassins, sabotage, front companies and double agents in an effort to interrupt the Iranian nuclear program, US intelligence experts told the British Daily Telegraph.

 

Opinion
 
Step closer to bomb / Isaac Ben-Israel
 
Iranian satellite has little significance but ballistic capabilities cause for concern
Full Story
 

According to the report, Israel has gone as far as orchestrating the assassination of high-profile figures in the Islamic Republic's regime.

 

A former CIA officer told the British newspaper: "Disruption is designed to slow progress on the program, done in such a way that they don't realize what's happening…The goal is delay, delay, delay until you can come up with some other solution or approach."

 

A senior analyst with a private American intelligence company said that Israel's main strategy was to eliminate key Iranian figures.

 

"With cooperation from the United States, Israeli covert operations have focused both on eliminating key human assets involved in the nuclear program and in sabotaging the Iranian nuclear supply chain," she told the Telegraph.

 

In this regard, the paper mentioned Iranian nuclear scientist Ardeshire Hassanpour who died in what was defined as "gas poisoning" in 2007. His death has been linked to the Israeli Mossad.

 

Other top Iranian officials involved in the nuclear program have also been "taken out" by Israel, Western intelligence sources told the paper.


According to the report, Israel has also been using front companies to supply the Iranian regime with faulty or defective items for its nuclear plants.

 

However, a former CIA chief said he was skeptical as to the efficacy of these actions in causing substantial harm to the Iranian efforts. You cannot carry out foreign policy objectives via covert operations," he told the Telegraph. "You can't get rid of a couple of people and hope to affect Iran's nuclear capability."
Partager cet article
Repost0
15 février 2009 7 15 /02 /février /2009 23:22
Iran Is Helping Taliban in Afghanistan, Petraeus Says (Update1)

By Henry Meyer

Feb. 14 (Bloomberg) -- Iran is helping Taliban insurgents in Afghanistan, said General David Petraeus, who is in charge of U.S. forces in the Central Asian nation and Iraq.

“There is a willingness to provide some degree of assistance to make the life of those who are trying to help the Afghan people difficult,” Petraeus told a conference today in the Qatari capital, Doha.

Petraeus gave no details of the Iranian assistance, which he described as taking place at “a small level.” The U.S. and its allies are watching Iran’s actions in Afghanistan “very, very closely,” he said, adding that the Persian Gulf state continues to train and equip Shiite Muslim militias in neighboring Iraq.

The Obama administration is preparing to commit as many as 30,000 more troops over the next year to beat back a renewed Taliban insurgency. Petraeus’s comments come as the U.S. is seeking to start a dialogue with Iran amid a continued standoff over its nuclear program.

Shiite Muslim Iran cooperated with the 2001 U.S.-led invasion of Afghanistan that toppled the militant Sunni Muslim Taliban, noted Petraeus.

“It’s not in their interests to see the Taliban, a Sunni ultra-conservative, extremist element, return to take control of Afghanistan,” he told the conference on the U.S. role in the Islamic World.

Support to Iraq

Petraeus, who commanded the U.S. military in Iraq before taking over as head of forces in Central Asia and the Middle East, said that Iranian military ties to “special groups” in Iraq was “one of the elements fueling” violence between Sunnis and Shias that brought Iraq to the verge of civil war in 2006 and 2007.

“There is absolutely no question about this, and there is also no question that some of this does continue to this day,” Petraeus said.

The additional forces in Afghanistan would be part of a shift of emphasis under President Barack Obama to make that country the main focus of U.S. efforts to combat terrorism as violence declines in Iraq. Insurgent attacks in Afghanistan last year rose to the highest level since the 2001 invasion.

After Qatar, Petraeus is due to travel onto Uzbekistan. The Central Asian nation borders Afghanistan and housed a U.S. air base until 2005, when its government ordered the American military to leave.

Potential Setback

The U.S.-NATO effort in Afghanistan suffered a potential setback earlier this month when another Central Asian country, Kyrgyzstan, announced plans to end American access to an air base in the country.

The base at the Manas airport near the capital of Bishkek is a prime transit point for personnel and cargo moving in and out of Afghanistan. There are about 37,000 U.S. troops in Afghanistan as well as 32,000 troops from other North Atlantic Treaty Organization members.

The U.S. is considering alternative supply routes into Afghanistan even as it seeks to retain access to Manas.

Kyrgyz President Kurmanbek Bakiyev announced plans to close the U.S. base while visiting Moscow on Feb. 3. During the visit, Bakiyev received a Russian pledge for more than $2 billion in economic assistance.

Russia is pushing the new Obama administration to reconsider U.S. plans to station missile defense bases in Poland and the Czech Republic. It also opposes NATO expansion to include its former Soviet neighbors, Ukraine and Georgia.

To contact the reporter on this story: Henry Meyer in Doha via the Dubai newsroom at hmeyer4@bloomberg.net

Partager cet article
Repost0
15 février 2009 7 15 /02 /février /2009 09:48
Diplomacy By Itself Won't Work With Iran

by Michael Rubin
Investor's Business Daily
February 13, 2009

http://www.meforum.org/article/2065

Send RSS

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad announced last summer that Iran possessed 6,000 centrifuges. But the problem is no longer just enrichment. Last week the Islamic Republic launched a satellite into orbit, demonstrating an intercontinental ballistic missile capacity.

Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei's confidants have repeatedly urged nuclear weapon development. Ayatollah Mohammad Baqer Kharrazi, secretary-general of Iranian Hezbollah, for example, declared in 2005: "We are able to produce atomic bombs, and we will do that. . . . The United States is not more than a barking dog."

During his campaign, Obama promised to meet unconditionally with Iran's leader and conduct "tough diplomacy." These are mutually exclusive.

Be Suspicious

If he sits down with Ahmadinejad without precondition, he will not only have sent Tehran the message that it can win by defiance rather than diplomacy. He has also unilaterally set aside three U.N. Security Council Resolutions demanding Iran cease its enrichment.

Too often, new U.S. administrations assume that the fault for failed diplomacy lies more with their predecessors than with their adversary. To believe any Iranian leader is sincere is dangerous.

In a June 14, 2008, debate, Abdollah Ramezanzadeh, government spokesman under Mohammad Khatami, criticized not Ahmadinejad's policy but his style, suggesting Khatami's strategy to lull the West better achieved Iran's nuclear aims.

"We had an overt policy, which was one of negotiation and confidence building, and a covert policy, which was continuation of the activities," Ramezanzadeh explained.

Indeed, it was during Khatami's "dialogue of civilizations" that Tehran built its covert enrichment facility and, according to International Atomic Energy Agency reports, experimented with plutonium and uranium metal. Neither has a role in energy production, but have military applications.

And, according to the 2007 National Intelligence Estimate, it was under the reformists that Iran actively worked on nuclear warhead design.

Obama may seek out Iranian moderates, but he should understand that, on the nuclear issue, differences between Iranian factions are illusionary. The supreme leader tolerates no officeholder who does not support his line on national security.

On Feb. 3, the Kayhan newspaper — Khamenei's mouthpiece — drove home the point by calling Obama's attempts to reach out to moderates "futile."

All this does not mean diplomacy is useless. But to be successful, it must be carefully crafted. Cost matters. Here, the Iran-Iraq War provides a lesson.

Ayatollah Khomeini swore to pursue war with Iraq until victory, even after expelling Iraqi troops from Iranian territory in 1982. His counterinvasion bogged into stalemate and led to several hundred thousand Iranian deaths. Finally, in 1988, as costs became insurmountable, Khomeini changed course. He agreed to a cease-fire, saying it was like drinking "a chalice of poison."

Iran is willing to switch course, but only when the costs of its policy become too great to bear. This means fewer incentives.

Bailing out a failing Iranian economy makes no strategic sense unless Obama's goal is to preserve regime longevity and provide Iran a greater industrial and financial base upon which to develop nuclear weapons and support terrorist groups.

Neither is it wise to slowly ratchet up sanctions. No sanction yet imposed compares to the deprivation Iranians suffered in the 1980s. Instead, to achieve diplomatic leverage, Obama should impose maximal sanctions but offer to relieve them as Tehran complies with U.N. resolutions. Even without Moscow and Beijing's cooperation, Obama can leverage significant pressure.

Under Section 311 of the U.S. Patriot Act, the president can designate Iranian banks — including Iran's central bank — as guilty of deceptive financial practices. In effect, such action would remove Iranian banks from the international financial stage, for neither Russian nor Chinese banks could risk the associated liability.

Project Power

A military strategy role also exists. Obama, his adult life spent in sheltered circles, should realize that the military is not just about bombing, and that containment and deterrence are not simply rhetorical concepts but require military planning.

Nor should Obama repeat the mistakes of Jimmy Carter. Military deployments can provide diplomatic leverage.

During the 1970 Black September hostage crisis and after the 1975 Khmer Rouge seizure of the U.S. container ship Mayaguez, Nixon and Ford, respectively, quietly deployed forces to augment leverage as the two presidents muted any public bluster.

Two days after Iranian revolutionaries seized the U.S. Embassy in 1979, Carter's aides leaked that the president would not consider military force — information that the captors said led them to retrench.

A quiet but steady buildup in the Persian Gulf can do more than the most skilled diplomat when facing the Iranian clerics.

George W. Bush had the luxury of time and squandered it. Barack Obama will not be so lucky. For him to succeed, he must abandon his idealistic notion that diplomacy by itself is a panacea.

Michael Rubin, a resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute and editor of the Middle East Quarterly, was an Iran country director at the Pentagon between September 2002 and April 2004.

Related Topics: Iran, US policy

Partager cet article
Repost0
13 février 2009 5 13 /02 /février /2009 14:50

MEMRI    Middle East Media Research Institute

Dépêche spéciale n° 2240

 

Le directeur de la télévision Al-Arabiya au sujet des prochaines élections en Iran : il n´y a pas lieu d´espérer la victoire de Khatami
 
La semaine dernière, l´ancien président iranien Mohammad Khatami a annoncé sa candidature aux élections présidentielles iraniennes, prévues en juin 2009. En réaction, Abdul Rahman Al-Rashed, directeur de la télévision Al-Arabiya et ancien directeur du quotidien londonien Al-Sharq Al-Awsat, a écrit un article paru dans Al-Sharq Al-Awsat, intitulé "Ne souhaitez pas la victoire de Khatami", où il qualifie les réformistes comme Khatami de "colombes sans ailes" précisant que "si un accord est signé [avec l´Iran], il faut que ce soit avec ceux qui détiennent réellement le pouvoir en Iran".
 
Ci-dessous l´article, paru dans la version anglaise d´Al-Sharq Al-Awsat : (1)
 
"(…) parier sur Khatami serait se méprendre, non en raison du dirigeant réformiste lui-même, mais plutôt du régime iranien"
 
"On sent son enthousiasme son intérêt ravivés à l´annonce de l´intention de l´ancien président iranien Mohamed Khatami de se présenter aux prochaines élections présidentielles.
 
Dans la longue lignée des dirigeants belliqueux, Khatami est généralement perçu comme un exemple de politicien iranien modéré épris de paix. Un jugement certes justifié, mais parier sur Khatami serait se méprendre, non en raison du dirigeant réformiste lui-même, mais plutôt en raison du régime iranien.
 
L´infrastructure politique iranienne est conçue pour ne pas permettre à un président élu comme Khatami – affilié à une coalition politique de grande ampleur et populaire mais de faible autorité – de diriger la grande politique iranienne de façon adaptée. On a pu le constater lors du dernier mandat présidentiel de Khatami, caractérisé par ses nombreux pas en arrière, devenus une source d´humiliation face aux partis extrémistes du régime. Les choses se sont dégradées à tel point que les journaux et magazines affiliés à Khatami ont été forcés de mettre la clé sous la porte, que les candidats de son parti ont été interdits de participation et ses employés harcelés, jusqu´à son départ de la présidence, sans avoir rien accompli de
 
"(…) il vaut mieux voir Ahmadinejad demeurer au pouvoir qu´espérer un président comme Khatami."
 
"En revanche, le personnage qu´est l´actuel président iranien Ahmadinejad appartient bien au régime au pouvoir et aux Gardiens de la Révolution, plus puissants et influents aujourd´hui que jamais par le passé, s´ingérant aussi bien dans les affaires intérieures qu´étrangères. En outre, il est plus proche [que Khatami] du dirigeant le plus puissant d´Iran : le Guide religieux suprême, l´ayatollah Ali Khamenei. C´est pourquoi il vaut mieux voir Ahmadinejad demeurer au pouvoir qu´espérer un président comme Khatami.
 
Les prochaines élections iraniennes ne seront pas de vraies élections, mais sont conçues pour satisfaire les besoins du régime iranien fondamentaliste, fermé aux éléments extérieurs. Ce régime a atteint [un tel niveau de] fanatisme qu´il a bloqué la candidature de deux mille islamistes aux élections législatives, ces derniers étant perçus comme des réformistes du style de Khatami. En outre, [la campagne] électorale avait une si faible marge de manœuvre que les candidats n´étaient pas autorisés à débattre ou à apparaître dans des campagnes publicitaires télévisées.
 
Nous apprécions l´attitude et les opinions des réformateurs tels que Khatami ainsi que leur esprit libéral qui permet une communication réaliste sur tous les sujets. Ces sujets incluent les problèmes épineux que sont leur programme nucléaire, leur présence dans les pays étrangers et les relations diplomatiques tendues. C´est pourquoi même en temps de désaccord, nous pouvons incontestablement coexister avec un régime dirigé par Khatami, ce qui n´était pas possible avec les précédents dirigeants à la ligne dure.
 
Le manque de confiance est le principal problème entre nous et les Iraniens. Ils affirment développer l´énergie nucléaire à des fins exclusivement pacifiques, alors que tout indique qu´elle sera utilisée à des fins militaires. Lugubre spectacle que celui des agissements politiques et militaires de l´Iran dans notre région."
 
"[Les réformateurs] sont une colombe sans ailes : si un accord est conclu, il faut que ce soit avec ceux qui détiennent véritablement le pouvoir."
 
"Les islamistes réformateurs [comme Khatami] représentent la meilleure option. Toutefois ils ne seront pas pour nous une grande source de satisfaction, même s´ils arrivent au pouvoir aux prochaines élections de printemps, parce qu´ils sont une colombe sans ailes : si un accord est conclu, il faut que ce soit avec ceux qui détiennent véritablement le pouvoir."
 
 

(1) Al-Sharq Al-Awsat (Londres), 10 février 2009.

 

 
 
Pour consulter l´intégralité des dépêches de MEMRI en français et les archives, libres d´accès, visiter le site www.memri.org/french.

 

Veuillez adresser vos emails à memri@memrieurope.org.

 

Le MEMRI détient les droits d´auteur sur toutes ses traductions. Celles-ci ne peuvent être citées qu´avec mention de la source.

 

Partager cet article
Repost0
13 février 2009 5 13 /02 /février /2009 08:06
U.S. now sees Iran as pursuing nuclear bomb
In a reversal since a 2007 report, U.S. officials expect the Islamic Republic to reach development milestones this year.
By Greg Miller
February 12, 2009
Reporting from Washington -- Little more than a year after U.S. spy agencies concluded that Iran had halted work on a nuclear weapon, the Obama administration has made it clear that it believes there is no question that Tehran is seeking the bomb.

In his news conference this week, President Obama went so far as to describe Iran's "development of a nuclear weapon" before correcting himself to refer to its "pursuit" of weapons capability.

Obama's nominee to serve as CIA director, Leon E. Panetta, left little doubt about his view last week when he testified on Capitol Hill. "From all the information I've seen," Panetta said, "I think there is no question that they are seeking that capability."

The language reflects the extent to which senior U.S. officials now discount a National Intelligence Estimate issued in November 2007 that was instrumental in derailing U.S. and European efforts to pressure Iran to shut down its nuclear program.

As the administration moves toward talks with Iran, Obama appears to be sending a signal that the United States will not be drawn into a debate over Iran's intent.

"When you're talking about negotiations in Iran, it is dangerous to appear weak or naive," said Joseph Cirincione, a nuclear weapons expert and president of the Ploughshares Fund, an anti-proliferation organization based in Washington.

Cirincione said the unequivocal language also worked to Obama's political advantage. "It guards against criticism from the right that the administration is underestimating Iran," he said.

Iran has long maintained that it aims to generate electricity, not build bombs, with nuclear power. But Western intelligence officials and nuclear experts increasingly view those claims as implausible.

U.S. officials said that although no new evidence had surfaced to undercut the findings of the 2007 estimate, there was growing consensus that it provided a misleading picture and that the country was poised to reach crucial bomb-making milestones this year.

Obama's top intelligence official, Dennis C. Blair, the director of national intelligence, is expected to address mounting concerns over Iran's nuclear program in testimony before the Senate Intelligence Committee today.

When it was issued, the NIE stunned the international community. It declared that U.S. spy agencies judged "with high confidence that in fall 2003, Tehran halted its nuclear weapons program."

U.S. intelligence officials later said the conclusion was based on evidence that Iran had stopped secret efforts to design a nuclear warhead around the time of the U.S. invasion of Iraq.

Often overlooked in the NIE, officials said, was that Iran had not stopped its work on other crucial fronts, including missile design and uranium enrichment. Many experts contend that these are more difficult than building a bomb.

Iran's advances on enrichment have become a growing source of alarm. Since 2004, the country has gone from operating a few dozen centrifuges -- cylindrical machines used to enrich uranium -- to nearly 6,000, weapons experts agree.

By November, Iran had produced an estimated 1,400 pounds of low-enriched uranium, not nearly enough to fuel a nuclear energy reactor, but perilously close to the quantity needed to make a bomb.

A report issued last month by the Institute for Science and International Security concluded that "Iran is moving steadily toward a breakout capability and is expected to reach that milestone during the first half of 2009." That means it would have enough low-enriched uranium to be able to quickly convert it to weapons-grade material.

Tehran's progress has come despite CIA efforts to sabotage shipments of centrifuge components on their way into Iran and entice the country's nuclear scientists to leave.

Iran still faces considerable hurdles. The country touted its launch of a 60-pound satellite into orbit this month. Experts said Iran's rockets would need to be able to carry more than 2,000 pounds to deliver a first-generation nuclear bomb.

And there are indications that the U.S. and Iran are interested in holding serious diplomatic discussions for the first time in three decades. Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said this week that his nation was "ready to hold talks based on mutual respect," and Obama indicated that his administration would look for opportunities "in the coming months."

Hassan Qashqavi, spokesman for Iran's Foreign Ministry, on Wednesday warned the U.S. not to wait for Iranian presidential elections this year, because ultimate authority rests with supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

He also said Iran would be patient.

"Since a new administration came to power in the U.S., we do not want to burn the opportunity of President Obama and give him time to change the reality on the ground," Qashqavi said.

But experts said Iran was now close enough to nuclear weapons capability that it may be less susceptible to international pressure.

"They've made more progress in the last five years than in the previous 10," Cirincione said.

greg.miller@latimes.com

Special correspondent Ramin Mostaghim in Tehran contributed to this report.
Partager cet article
Repost0
12 février 2009 4 12 /02 /février /2009 18:58
 
avatar
Obama Blacklists Kurdish Group In Gesture to Tehran
11 Feb 2009

February 9, 2009
Kenneth R. Timmerman
Newsmax.com



The Treasury Department has blacklisted an Iranian Kurdish opposition group based in northern Iraq, a move that was greeted enthusiastically in Iran state-run media as part of a initiative by the Obama administration to forge better U.S.-Iranian relations.
The Party of Free Life of Iranian Kurdistan, known by its Kurdish acronym, PJAK, was created in 2004 and has never engaged in international terrorism or in military activity outside of Iran.
But its guerilla fighters have clashed frequently with Iranian Revolutionary Guards units in Iranian Kurdish towns and villages, making it a primary target of the Iranian regime.

In November, for example, the provincial police commander in Iran's West Azerbaijan province, Brigadier Hassan Karami, told the state-owned Iran Press TV that his troops had clashed with PJAK units 65 times since March, killing 13 PJAK fighters and wounding 24 others.

Iran has complained frequently about PJAK's activities, and has launched repeated artillery attacks and even airstrikes against PJAK bases in the Qandil mountains of northern Iraq. But until now, Iran's efforts to get PJAK branded as a terrorist organization – both in Europe and the United States – have failed.
"With today's action, we are exposing PJAK's terrorist ties to the KGK and supporting Turkey's efforts to protect its citizens from attack," said the Treasury Department news release announcing the designation.

The Treasury statement claimed that PJAK was "controlled by the terrorist group Kongra-Gel (KGK, aka the Kurdistan Workers Party or PKK)."
But the KGK is a pan-Kurdish political Congress, separate from PJAK and from the PKK, which officially dissolved itself in 2000, said Nilufer Kok, a KGK vice-president.
PJAK officials say that, although PJAK takes part in the sessions of the Kongra-Gel, it is controlled by its own party Congress that convenes in northern Iraq, not by the KGK.
The Treasury Department statement claims that the "KGK formally institutionalized PJAK in 2004 and selected five KGK members to serve as PJAK leaders, including Hajji Ahmadi, a KGK affiliate who became PJAK's General Secretary."

In interviews with Newsmax in Washington, D.C., and in Europe, Rahman Haji Ahmadi repeatedly has denied any affiliation with the PKK. "We are an Iranian party, fighting the Iranian regime. We have nothing to do with Turkey," he said.

"But the Iranians know they can't make trouble for us directly because they have bad relations with the U.S. and Europe. So they go through Turkey. It's the Iranians who are saying that PJAK and the PKK are the same."

The Turkish government has been pressuring the United States to put PJAK on the terrorism list for the past eighteen months, and welcomed last week's move by the Treasury Department.
"PJAK is a terrorist organization, and we see the US putting it on its terror list as a positive development," Brig. Gen. Metin Gürak, head of the General Staff's communications department, told reporters in Ankara Thursday.

The Turkish foreign ministry also issued a congratulatory statement praising the U.S. move. "PJAK and PKK are not two separate organizations," a Turkish official told Newsmax. "They are one and the same. That's just a fact." But when pressed, the official could not provide any evidence of cooperation between PJAK and PKK, and acknowledged that the two groups were based in different parts of the Qandil mountain range of northern Iraq.
Independent observers traveling to the region have found no PKK presence at PJAK bases, and no political, military or strategic cooperation between the two groups.

In mid-2007, Iran and Turkey established a joint operational headquarters in Ourmieh, Turkey, to plan combined military operations against PKK and PJAK bases in northern Iraq. The Iranian and Turkish military began shelling Kurdish camps inside Iraq that spring.

Iran is a self-avowed U.S. enemy, while Turkey is a U.S. ally and founding member of NATO.
In November 2007, Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan came to Washington, seeking a green-light from President George W. Bush to launch a ground invasion against PKK bases in northern Iraq. While the U.S. turned down his request at the time, Turkish troops moved into northern Iraq several months later.

Since that time, the United States and Turkey have exchanged intelligence information on terrorism "on a real time basis," knowledgeable sources tell Newsmax.
According to an August 29, 2008, report from the Congressional Research Service, the Bush administration "has been wary of Turkey's warming of relations with Iran."
When Turkey announced it was planning to finalize a deal to invest in Iran's South Pars natural gas field during Ahmadinejad's official visit to Ankara last August, the State Department issued a sharp warning.

Such a deal "would send the wrong message at a time when the Iranian regime has repeatedly failed to comply with its U.N. Security Council and IAEA obligations," a State Department official said. "This is not a time to do business with Iran. It is a time for the international community, including our ally Turkey, to begin considering additional measures to pressure Iran."

PJAK leaders told Newsmax during a reporting tour of rebel bases in northern Iraq in October 2007 that their fighters frequently engage Iranian Revolutionary Guards troops inside Iran's Kurdish region, primarily in response to Rev. Guards attacks on Kurdish civilians or PJAK political workers.
In the July 2005, for example, a Kurdish human rights activist was brutally murdered by regime agents and his body dragged through the streets of the Iranian Kurdish town of Mahabad behind a jeep.
When local Kurds protested massively and the regime cracked down, killing dozens of Kurds and arresting hundreds more, PJAK guerillas attacked Revolutionary Guards troops in 10 different places.

The PJAK counterstrikes were meant as a warning to the regime that such actions "would no longer go unpunished," a PJAK guerilla said.
[Editor's Note: Read Ken Timmerman's eyewitness reporting from a PJAK guerrilla base in northern Iraq - Go Here Now]
PJAK officials tell Newsmax they believe the Treasury Department action was primarily motivated by a desire to win Iranian cooperation in reducing terrorism inside Iraq.
"When the U.S. signed the Status of Forces agreement with the Maliki government, they were hoping to get Iran to reduce its support of Ansar al Islam and other terrorist organizations in Iraq," said Shamal Bishir, a PJAK representative who spoke to Newsmax on Monday by telephone from Europe. "In exchange, the United States allowed Iran to have greater influence in the Kurdish areas."

Bishir said the group intended to launch legal action against the Treasury Department to get the designation removed.
Kenneth Katzman, a Middle East analyst at the Congressional Research Service, told Newsmax that the Treasury Designation does not mean the group has been put on the State Department's list of Foreign Terrorist organizations.
"The designation under Executive Order 13224 is not as wide-ranging or as politically significant as an FTO designation," he said. "There are lots of entities designated under 13224 that never wind up on the FTO list."

Under the Executive Order, the U.S. will freeze the group's assets and prohibit American citizens from doing business with it, the Treasury Department statement said.
PJAK leader Rahman Haji Ahmadi warned that if Turkey is successful in dislodging PJAK fighters from Iraq's border with Iran, this could have dire consequences for Iraq's security.
"Turkey wants to control the Qandil mountains with Iran. When they do, they will open the border and allow al Qaeda and Ansar al Isslam fighters to come in. And this will make Erbil [the capital of Iraqi Kurdistan] like Fallujah used to be," he told Newsmax.
U.S. military commanders have credited PJAK with protecting Iraq's border with Iran from terrorist infiltration, but have shied short of any cooperation with the group.

Roughly one-third of PJAK guerilla fighters are women. Haji Ahmadi called this part of his project to reduce the influence of the Islamists ruling Iran.
"When you give a gun to a woman, she doesn't have to wear hijab. She can sit down with a man on an equal basis. This is a big blow to the Islamists," he said.
A State Department official noted that while PJAK was not yet on its list of Foreign Terrorist Organizations, "we condemn the group's violent activities."
Neither the Treasury Department or the White House responded to requests for comment.




Partager cet article
Repost0

Présentation

  • : Le blog de Gad
  • : Lessakele : déjouer les pièges de l'actualité Lessakele, verbe hébraïque qui signifie "déjouer" est un blog de commentaire libre d'une actualité disparate, visant à taquiner l'indépendance et l'esprit critique du lecteur et à lui prêter quelques clés de décrytage personnalisées.
  • Contact

Traducteur

English German Spanish Portuguese Italian Dutch
Russian Polish Hebrew Czech Greek Hindi

Recherche

Magie de la langue hébraïque


A tous nos chers lecteurs.

 

Ne vous est-il jamais venu à l'esprit d'en savoir un peu plus sur le titre de ce blog ?

Puisque nous nous sommes aujourd'hui habillés de bleu, il conviendrait de rentrer plus a fond dans l'explication du mot lessakel.

En fait Lessakel n'est que la façon française de dire le mot léhasskil.

L'hébreu est une langue qui fonctionne en déclinant des racines.

Racines, bilitères, trilitères et quadrilitères.

La majorité d'entre elle sont trilitères.

Aussi Si Gad a souhaité appeler son site Lessakel, c'est parce qu'il souhaitait rendre hommage à l'intelligence.

Celle qui nous est demandée chaque jour.

La racine de l'intelligence est sé'hel שכל qui signifie l'intelligence pure.

De cette racine découlent plusieurs mots

Sé'hel > intelligence, esprit, raison, bon sens, prudence, mais aussi croiser

Léhasskil > Etre intelligent, cultivé, déjouer les pièges

Sé'hli > intelligent, mental, spirituel

Léhistakel > agir prudemment, être retenu et raisonnable, chercher à comprendre

Si'hloute > appréhension et compréhension

Haskala >  Instruction, culture, éducation

Lessa'hlen > rationaliser, intellectualiser

Heschkel > moralité

Si'htanout > rationalisme

Si'hloul > Amélioration, perfectionnement

 

Gageons que ce site puisse nous apporter quelques lumières.

Aschkel pour Lessakel.

 

 

Les news de blogs amis